Sep 11, 2020

September 9, 2020: It's Health Care Stupid, Heartless Response, Not Promising Much


Citing work done by longtime Democratic pollster Stan Greenberg, Washington Post columnist Helaine Olen reports what Greenberg has found:

Last month, longtime pollster Stan Greenberg listened to a number of focus groups conducted in working-class and rural areas of Wisconsin, Michigan, Maine and Ohio. They were heavy on people who supported President Trump in 2016, and many were now leaning toward voting for Joe Biden in 2020. But if Democrats want to gain these voters, they’ll need to do better on one key issue.\
'In today’s working class and rural communities, health care is everything,” Greenberg wrote, in recent piece in the American Prospect. “The health care system is failing them, and they want someone to fix it.'

And they will vote for whomever promises to do just that — and abandon those leaders when they don’t deliver, Greenberg warns. It’s why they voted for Trump in 2016, and why they turned on the Republican Party in 2018. (It’s also, I should add, one reason people voted for Barack Obama in 2008 but turned on the Democratic Party in 2010. As I’ve long observed, people seem to conflate the phrase “Affordable Care Act” with their own situation.)

As for now, it’s the covid-19 pandemic, but it’s more than that. It’s the epidemic of opioid deaths — which appear to be rising significantly this year — and the increasing costs of coverage, both of insurance, co-pays and other out-of-pocket expenses. It’s the impossibility of navigating our health-care system and managing to emerge financially intact.

These long-running crises are more pressing than ever. More than 4 in 10 working-age Americans experienced inadequate health-care coverage at some point in the past year — either because they lacked health insurance or were forced to pay such a high percentage of their income in the form of deductibles and co-pays that they might as well have been. The percentage of people with a deductible of $1,000 or more has doubled since 2010 and now stands at 46 percent, according to a recent Commonwealth Fund survey. In particular, 40 percent of Latinos reported lacking insurance either at the time of the survey, or at some point within the past year, something to keep in mind when wondering why, as a group, they are much more likely to die from covid-19 than White Americans.
Over and over again, people sitting in the focus groups Greenberg listened in on talked about medical bills in the tens of thousands of dollars, and how the high deductibles made health insurance plans all but unusable — one person had a $16,000 deductible — and arbitrary denials that made their often hard lives even more precarious. One women discussed not being able to afford an EpiPen for a grandchild suffering from allergies after her insurance company refused to authorize it.
Biden says he plans to improve on the Affordable Care Act, increasing subsidies as well as demanding that Medicare negotiate with pharmaceutical companies over the price of drugs, something currently banned by law. He also says he will offer up a “public option” — a Medicare-like government offering that competes with private insurers — and expand Medicare to cover people 60 and up.

But how serious Biden, who has been a faithful servant of corporate interests for the entirety of his legislative career, is about fixing the monster that is our health-care system is entirely unclear. The medical industrial complex is adamantly against the public option, for starters. Biden says he’s committed, but when the Hill recently asked the Biden campaign whether officials would immediately present legislation on a public option, or start with smaller health-care fixes, the newspaper received no response. And as Libby Watson noted at the New Republic, at the Democratic convention, even Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) didn’t mention the public option during his appearance.\

One of the conundrums of the Democratic primaries — when Medicare-for-all loomed large — was that a large number of people supported substantive health-care reform but often didn’t vote their preference. They’re supporting Biden over Trump, in many cases, because they want to see Trump gone, not because they support his position on health-care reform.

Moreover, Biden’s health-care pitch, much of which rested on the shaky premise that Americans loved their workplace health insurance, increasingly feels like something out of a time warp. Tens of millions of Americans have lost their jobs since mid-March, and the pace of weekly layoffs is picking up.
Republicans certainly have no answer. When a constituent with cancer recently called Sen. Thom Tillis’s (R-N.C.) office asking about the high cost of health insurance and her fears she would lose hers, the response was heartless. “Sounds like something you’re going to have to figure it out,” the staffer told her, while comparing the need for health insurance to a “new dress shirt” she shouldn’t buy if she couldn’t afford.

But if the Democrats don’t come up with a solution that actually helps people — if they don’t put a stop to surging premiums and deductibles, not to mention arbitrary denials and surprise medical bills and the entire cornucopia of financial horrors that comes with accessing the most necessary and needed health care in the United States, it seems likely voters will, once again, move on. If Biden is elected president but fails to deliver, don’t be surprised to discover that 2022 turns out to be a repeat of 2010.” (1)

The medical/insurance cartels are holding the country hostage. The awful truth is that not only are these cabals sucking nearly twenty five percent out of the national economy, but will will, when the time comes, hijack a huge percentage of the generational wealth when it changes hands.

Greenberg is right. As pointed out in these columns in 2017, Donald tRUMP ran to the 'left' of virtually the entire Republican field in 2016, promising affordable health care that would cover all, saying that “it isn't popular among Republicans”, and adding that the government would pay for it, because there would be great savings on the other side. A point reaffirmed by a study funded by the Koch Brothers, much to their chagrin.

Disgustus, of course, had already signed on to Paul Ryan's agenda meaning that his assurances were complete bullshit, but he knew they would resonate among the masses struggling under the weight of the burden and fearing for their well-being.

The question lingers? What if the Democrats had nominated Bernie? Sanders, famously, went on Fox News and held a town hall meeting. After presenting his argument in favor of government-run single-payer health care, the moderator asked the audience—a hand-picked FOX audience—how many supported the idea. Both the audience and the moderator were shocked when about 80 percent raised their hands. These were, by and large, tRUMP supporters responding to a populist appeal for an end to the exploitation of the sick and aged.

Biden, riding high in the polls, is an illusion. He is not building a coalition. Most of his support, as stated in the article, comes from an overweening desire by the American public to rid itself of the pestilence of tRUMP. The great 'coalition' of former Republicans, conservatives, Democrats and progressives will fracture on election night and Biden, should he be elected, will find himself with little genuine support backed by even less enthusiasm. Those on the 'right' will return to their errant ways, those on the 'left' will impatiently await the blows of cruel fate.

Biden's only saving grace is that at least he isn't promising much.

An Br'er Putin he jus' laugh and laugh

Flush this turd, November 3rd

___________




September 5, 2020: Achieving the Unthinkable, Empty Shirt, The Future Won


Joe Kennedy III has lost. For the first time a Kennedy has lost in a Massachusetts Democratic primary.  He not only lost the election, but was crushed in a landslide, 56-44 per cent.  

The grandson of Robert F. Kennedy went about achieving the unthinkable, losing a contest that, earlier in the year, and leading in the polls by up to 17 points, looked like a cake-walk.  Indeed, many treated the Senator, who had labored over two decades in the House of Representatives, as a mere place-holder--someone to keep the seat warm until the young Kennedy decided to reclaim it.  It wasn't to be.  Not this time; not with this Senator. 

In his 'concession' speech, if one can call it that, the young congressman said that he was surprised that his 'name' dominated the contest. Really? For what other reason could there be for his upstart challenge to a sitting Senator from his own party?

Surely, it wasn't over the issues, for he and Senator Markey differ on very little—except, of course, the Senator is much more bold and progressive than his upstart challenger.

It is a bit ironic to run on the Kennedy name while presenting oneself as a pale imitation of the man you want to replace; for Markey had embraced The Green New Deal, as well as Elizabeth Warren's Wall Street reforms.  Indeed, he proved himself to be a pale imitation of his forebears; his grandfather, referencing Tennyson, once implored us To Seek A Newer World, this Kennedy, on the other hand, spoke of tired, old, solutions. 

 Kennedy, running to the 'right' of Markey, was much more circumscribed, revealing himself to basically be an 'empty shirt' proving, once again, the maxim that succeeding generations revert to the mean.

Of course, the Democratic establishment, principally House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, drawn by the magic of all things Kennedy, endorsed him. But the future, represented by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the up-and-coming New York Congresswoman who had authored, along with Markey, the Green New Deal said otherwise. The future won.

In one of Kennedy's Facebook postings I commented that he needs to drop the Roman numerals after his name, for it reeks of pomposity and privilege. In any case if one is to run on the legacy of youth, energy and all things Kennedy, one would expect an agenda of bold new ideas; one would expect a vision more about the future than the past. In old man Markey, the future won.