Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jimmy Carter. Show all posts

Apr 28, 2019

April 28, 2019: Rescuing Netanyahu, Time to Face Facts, Death Of The Two-State Solution.


We must not let the time pass without commenting on what, in the last month, has transpired in the Middle East.  Our Caesar Disgustus has come to the rescue of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu by recognizing the annexation by Israel of the Golan Heights.  Our Disgustus did this without consulting our allies, the Congress, or even the U.S. State Department.  It was yet another example of government by tweeting.  Only a birdbrain tweets.

This, of course, is a complete reversal of U.S. and allied policy toward Israel which not only gives credence to Israel's illegitimate claims upon the territory and further emboldens Israel's truculent behavior, but further isolates the United States in the international community.

It is time for the United States to face facts.  The Israeli's have never been serious about negotiating with the Palestinians.  They have, since the six-day war, used whatever peace processes were imposed upon them to delay and obstruct in order to continue their policies of ethnic cleansing and occupying the seized territories.  I remember my late mother-in-law returning from a trip to the region with a map as a souvenir in which Israel was drawn including territories they called Judea and Samaria, that is, the occupied west bank.  And indeed, the practice of fracturing the territory by building settlements pell-mell in the region, building "Jews Only" highways connecting them and further fracturing the territory, and  establishing hundreds of check points to protect this infrastructure within the region assured that a future Palestine, had it ever been recognized, would have looked like Swiss cheese and been nothing but an Israeli colony.

Jimmy Carter understands what has happened.  In the wake of the Camp David accords, Israel used the agreement to trade territory that is largely useless to them in exchange for dividing the Arab world, a division that cost Egyptian President Anwar Sadat his life, after which for Israel it became business as usual.  Israel treated the agreement as just another stratagem and went about the real business of annexation.  Carter, seeing this has, for good reason, become a critic of Israel.

The United States has never been, despite it's international posturing, even-handed in this.  The U.S. has always come down, in the end, on the side of the Israeli's.  Oh, one protests, what about this rebuke or that in the last half-century?  They have been mere slaps upon the wrist, mere admonitions, as we look the other way.  How else does one explain our constant condemnation of Palestinian resistance and "terror" when we never condemn Israel for provoking it?  How else does one explain our incessant pre-occupation with developing nuclear capability in Iran (or Iraq when Saddam Hussein ran amok U.S. policymakers), while never calling out the Israeli's and demanding that they give up their nuclear weapons?  How else to explain going to war with Iraq for violations of U.N. Security Council resolutions while standing stone silent in the face of over two dozen Israeli violations of the same?  All of this is lost on the ignorant American population but none of this is lost on the residents of the region.

It is also time to face the fact that the "two-state solution" is dead. If we are to be compelled to recognize, in the end, the annexation of the occupied territory then we must demand a "One-State" solution, wherein everyone within what now amounts to "greater Israel" is accorded citizenship and voting rights.  The West must demand that every Palestinian be recognized as a voting citizen, that there will be--as in South Africa and elsewhere--no apartheid.  This will, effectively, end the concept of the Jewish State and force Israel to join the rest of humanity.  In such a state, walls are unnecessary.

Netanyahu was in a tight race and the prospects were good that he would have been replaced had not Disgustus raced to his rescue.  By negotiating the Faustian bargain Netanyahu, himself under indictment for corruption, won another term, but he did it by destroying his country.   As Thomas Freidman, long an observer of the region, has observed, annexation means the end of Israel as it was founded.  It is time for the West to recognize it and demand full participation of the indigenous population.

But for our immediate purposes other questions linger in the mist: just what did tRUMP and Kushner get from this slavish devotion to Netanyahu and his coalition?  The ReSCUMlickans have long been playing footsie with Israel's wrong-wing, but why suddenly are we moving so swiftly on their behalf?  Oh, the religious wrong in this country support such moves so that the ancient "kingdom" of Israel, once established, would then re-build the temple and bring about the second coming of the great sky-god, but we all know tRUMP believes none of it.  There must be some transactional consideration--some form of remuneration--for Disgustus is nothing, if not transactional.  Could it be another monument or two to himself?  A tRUMP tower here or there?  Tel-Aviv, Jericho, Bethlehem, Nazareth, or perhaps looming over the new temple on the mount itself.  Already the Israeli's have announced a new settlement named in his honor.  But this means nothing to Disgustus, what he wants is money.

And, so for thirty pieces of silver Netanyahu has sold out his country, and Donald J. tRUMP has done likewise, further isolating both Israel and the United States in the world community, further undermining the authority and legitimacy of international organizations, further destabilizing the region, and further opening the door to Russian influence.  It is clear now for all the world to see:  the United States is no longer an honest broker in the region and the world will no longer look to Washington for guidance.  That role will go elsewhere, perhaps Moscow.

This is what happens when a birdbrain "tweets".

"An Br'er Putin, he jus laugh and laugh"

Impeach and Imprison.

Apr 24, 2015

April 24, 2015: Losing My Religion, Oh No I’ve Said Too Much, I Haven’t Said Enough


“That's me in the corner
That's me in the spotlight
Losing my religion
Trying to keep up with you
And I don't know if I can do it
Oh no, I've said too much
I haven't said enough”

----R.E.M. “Losing My Religion” (1)

Deeply influenced by Reinhold Niebuhr,(2) especially his work “Moral Man and Immoral Society”, Former President Jimmy Carter has spent his life conducting himself according to the principles of ‘Christian Realism’.  The following essay, published July 15, 2009 on the website “The Age” (3)is illustrative of the former President’s theological evolution as it relates to the struggles of a moral man grappling with the immorality of convention.

“Losing my Religion for Equality” — by Jimmy Carter


“I have been a practicing Christian all my life and a deacon and Bible teacher for many years. My faith is a source of strength and comfort to me, as religious beliefs are to hundreds of millions of people around the world. So my decision to sever my ties with the Southern Baptist Convention, after six decades, was painful and difficult. It was, however, an unavoidable decision when the convention's leaders, quoting a few carefully selected Bible verses and claiming that Eve was created second to Adam and was responsible for original sin, ordained that women must be "subservient" to their husbands and prohibited from serving as deacons, pastors or chaplains in the military service.
This view that women are somehow inferior to men is not restricted to one religion or belief. Women are prevented from playing a full and equal role in many faiths. Nor, tragically, does its influence stop at the walls of the church, mosque, synagogue or temple. This discrimination, unjustifiably attributed to a Higher Authority, has provided a reason or excuse for the deprivation of women's equal rights across the world for centuries.

At its most repugnant, the belief that women must be subjugated to the wishes of men excuses slavery, violence, forced prostitution, genital mutilation and national laws that omit rape as a crime. But it also costs many millions of girls and women control over their own bodies and lives, and continues to deny them fair access to education, health, employment and influence within their own communities.

The impact of these religious beliefs touches every aspect of our lives. They help explain why in many countries boys are educated before girls; why girls are told when and whom they must marry; and why many face enormous and unacceptable risks in pregnancy and childbirth because their basic health needs are not met.

In some Islamic nations, women are restricted in their movements, punished for permitting the exposure of an arm or ankle, deprived of education, prohibited from driving a car or competing with men for a job. If a woman is raped, she is often most severely punished as the guilty party in the crime.

The same discriminatory thinking lies behind the continuing gender gap in pay and why there are still so few women in office in the West. The root of this prejudice lies deep in our histories, but its impact is felt every day. It is not women and girls alone who suffer. It damages all of us. The evidence shows that investing in women and girls delivers major benefits for society. An educated woman has healthier children. She is more likely to send them to school. She earns more and invests what she earns in her family.

It is simply self-defeating for any community to discriminate against half its population. We need to challenge these self-serving and outdated attitudes and practices - as we are seeing in Iran where women are at the forefront of the battle for democracy and freedom.

I understand, however, why many political leaders can be reluctant about stepping into this minefield. Religion, and tradition, are powerful and sensitive areas to challenge. But my fellow Elders and I, who come from many faiths and backgrounds, no longer need to worry about winning votes or avoiding controversy - and we are deeply committed to challenging injustice wherever we see it.

The Elders are an independent group of eminent global leaders, brought together by former South African president Nelson Mandela, who offer their influence and experience to support peace building, help address major causes of human suffering and promote the shared interests of humanity. We have decided to draw particular attention to the responsibility of religious and traditional leaders in ensuring equality and human rights and have recently published a statement that declares: "The justification of discrimination against women and girls on grounds of religion or tradition, as if it were prescribed by a Higher Authority, is unacceptable."

We are calling on all leaders to challenge and change the harmful teachings and practices, no matter how ingrained, which justify discrimination against women. We ask, in particular, that leaders of all religions have the courage to acknowledge and emphasize the positive messages of dignity and equality that all the world's major faiths share.

The carefully selected verses found in the Holy Scriptures to justify the superiority of men owe more to time and place - and the determination of male leaders to hold onto their influence - than eternal truths. Similar biblical excerpts could be found to support the approval of slavery and the timid acquiescence to oppressive rulers.

I am also familiar with vivid descriptions in the same Scriptures in which women are revered as pre-eminent leaders. During the years of the early Christian church women served as deacons, priests, bishops, apostles, teachers and prophets. It wasn't until the fourth century that dominant Christian leaders, all men, twisted and distorted Holy Scriptures to perpetuate their ascendant positions within the religious hierarchy.

The truth is that male religious leaders have had - and still have - an option to interpret holy teachings either to exalt or subjugate women. They have, for their own selfish ends, overwhelmingly chosen the latter. Their continuing choice provides the foundation or justification for much of the pervasive persecution and abuse of women throughout the world. This is in clear violation not just of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights but also the teachings of Jesus Christ, the Apostle Paul, Moses and the prophets, Muhammad, and founders of other great religions - all of whom have called for proper and equitable treatment of all the children of God. It is time we had the courage to challenge these views.

Jimmy Carter was president of the United States from 1977 to 1981.” (3)

The long journey from the parochial certainties of youth to the embrace of a much wider universe is indeed the journey of life.

Here Mr. Carter has cataloged his departure from Act I for involution and, embracing the complexities of Act II, he is now writing Act III.

Oh no I’ve said too much
I haven’t said enough.
______
1. http://www.azlyrics.com/lyrics/rem/losingmyreligion.html
2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reinhold_Niebuhr
3.http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/losing-my-religion-for-equality-20090714-dk0v.html