“Too big
to fail is too big” ----From the ‘Quotations of Chairman Joe’
Last
week PBS aired a segment of its “Frontline” program entitled “The Untouchables” about the
Wall Street barons who have heretofore escaped criminal prosecution for
their part in creating the financial
crisis of 2007. The tale is, by now, a
dog-eared one, worn thin by constant repetition to the point where the nature
of the crisis is generally understood and the reasons for the lack of the
response by the Justice Department are not.
Senator
Sam Ervin, head of the special Senate committee investigating Watergate was
moved to famously quip “If it looks like a horse, walks like a horse, smells
and eats like a horse, one can confidently conclude that it’s a horse”. The judgments of the American People,
instinctively following a similar path of reason, have come to the same
conclusion.
Throughout
the segment FRONTLINE reporters unearthed mid-level “Due Diligence” loan
officials representing the major banks that reviewed loans from the likes of
Countryside and other loan originators saying on the record that they reviewed
packages of documents in which up to 50 and 60 percent of the loans did not
meet their banks’ criteria as a sound investment. These loans went under subsequent
re-evaluation in which they were then approved in their near entirety and
passed on to the banks investors by senior management as sound
investments. This is, at least, prima
facie securities fraud yet no legal action by the Department of Justice has
been initiated against any Wall Street executive. The program leaves the lingering question “why
not”?
It’s a good
question and goes to the heart of the Obama administration. Listening to the DOJ attorneys one got the
impression that the congress and the people were in the eyes of one Senate
staffer “being gamed”. DOJ officials
testifying before congress responded to specific questions with broad and vague
assertions that such cases are difficult, complex, and, most importantly, hard
to win. One DOJ attorney even went so
far as to assert that bringing such action may be deleterious to the financial
institutions being prosecuted resulting in broad ranging economic impact.
This
response smacks of the attitude emanating from the Attorney General, the
Department of the Treasury and, indeed the White House. Don’t rock the boat. So Justice is now being held hostage by the “fragility”
of the very house of cards that had brought on this mess in the first place.
This
begs a second and equally compelling question:
Why has there not been any meaningful anti-trust action taken by this
administration?
We have
reached again a stage of national economic development where our national
economy is, in each of its major industries, in the hands of a very few
institutions. The banks are an excellent
example. Six banks control 66 percent of
the national economy. These banks,
leveraging the massive government bailout with huge campaign contributions have
become a power unto themselves. Powerful
enough, it appears to cower the National Government. The problem with concentrating economic power
into so few hands is not simply that it masks a huge maldistribution of wealth,
but the health of the national—indeed the world—economy depends on their well-being. In a word they are too big to fail.
A good
maxim is “Too big to fail is too big”. Under
this dictum the question remains “Where is the Justice Department?”
It would
be easy to blame some assistant Attorney General for lack of zeal in the
enforcement of law. I think, given the
realities of power, that it’s a cop-out to hold such a view. The lack of proper legal response to the
financial industry reflects a core conviction of this White House which from
the beginning has been a shill for Wall Street.
It began with Paul Volker standing attentively behind the President and
watching over his shoulder in the early days of his first Administration. The appointment of Timothy Geitner, A Wall
Street impresario and one of the authors of the financial crisis as his first
Secretary of the Treasury. And last, but
not least, the appointment of Eric Holder as attorney General. The DOJ has not only failed to prosecute
Southern States under the Voting Rights Act of 1965 for the purging of the
voting rolls and other acts at voter intimidation and suppression, but it has
singularly failed to act with regard to not only prosecuting Wall Street
malfeasance but the Anti-Trust laws that made this crisis possible in the first
place.
No comments:
Post a Comment