Mar 15, 2018

March 15, 2018: Arrogance of Ignorance, Proud to be Stupid, Springtime for Sycophancy


"Caesar Disgustus prances about wearing his ignorance like a crown"
                 -----from "The Quotations of Chairman Joe"

Every day the country is presented with multiple outrages, blinding ignorance, and disturbing accounts of breathtaking dysfunction circling about the personage of our very own Caesar Disgustus.

An essay appearing on Rachel Maddow's blog, written by Steve Benen, chronicles the depth of ignorance and stupidity currently in residence at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. Not only are they in residence, but their presence is openly celebrated. Here is Mr. Benen's complete commentary:

About a year ago, Donald Trump sat down for an interview with the Associated Press, which touched on the president’s criticisms of NATO. He referenced an exchange he had during the campaign with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, in which then-candidate Trump expressed deep concerns about the security alliance despite “not knowing much about NATO.”
In other words, according to Trump, he spoke with great conviction about a key area of U.S. foreign policy, despite the fact that – by his own admission – he had no idea what he was talking about.
Yesterday, something very similar happened. The president spoke at a fundraiser about a conversation he had with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, in which the two leaders discussed which country had a trade deficit with the other. As the Washington Post  reported, Trump bragged last night that he made the private comments without having a clue as to whether or not he was correct.
Trudeau came to see me. He’s a good guy, Justin. He said, ‘No, no, we have no trade deficit with you, we have none. Donald, please,’ ” Trump said, mimicking Trudeau, according to audio obtained by The Washington Post. “Nice guy, good-looking guy, comes in – ‘Donald, we have no trade deficit.’ He’s very proud because everybody else, you know, we’re getting killed.
“… So, he’s proud. I said, ‘Wrong, Justin, you do.’ I didn’t even know…. I had no idea. I just said, ‘You’re wrong.’ You know why? Because we’re so stupid. … And I thought they were smart. I said, ‘You’re wrong, Justin.’ He said, ‘Nope, we have no trade deficit.’ I said, ‘Well, in that case, I feel differently,’ I said, ‘but I don’t believe it.’ I sent one of our guys out, his guy, my guy, they went out, I said, ‘Check, because I can’t believe it.’”
So, Trump started with the premise that the United States is “stupid” – a curious assumption for an American president – and then based his assumptions on that dubious foundation. It then led him to assume, without having any facts or having done any homework ahead of his meeting with the Canadian prime minister, that we have a trade deficit with our neighbors to the north.

According to last night’s story, Trump’s aide then came back to him to assure the president that he was, in fact, correct about the trade imbalance – which is bizarre, since, according to the Trump administration’s own data, the United States has a trade surplus with Canada.

What’s amazing about this story, however, isn’t just the American president being wrong about a simple issue he’s talked about for years.

Rather, what we have here is a president bragging about making stuff up, then assuring his audience that his evidence-free claims are accidentally true, without realizing that he’s still wrong. It’s like a lie wrapped in a gaffe inside propaganda.
For most presidents, this would be a deeply embarrassing moment that he hoped the public would never find out about. For this president, it’s an anecdote that Trump thinks makes him look better, not worse.

What’s more, given the circumstances, we have no reason to believe any of the conversations Trump described last night – the one with Trudeau or the one with the aide who looked up the trade details – actually happened in reality. It’s entirely possible the president just made up this part of the story, too.

After all, according to Trump, this is just what he does. Why anyone would ever take his word at face value is something of a mystery. When someone boasts about making stuff up, their credibility necessarily evaporates.

Donald Trump is not the nation’s first ignorant president. He is the first American president to brag about his ignorance, as if it’s worthy of celebration. “ (1)


This account comes close upon the heels of an account by economist Paul Krugman in this Tuesday's New York Times. Writing about tRUMP and trade, Krugman takes usual note of the tRUMP's usual nonsense, this time referencing trade with Mexico, Canada, and the European Union. Disgustus has “focused on an unexpected target: the European Union, which he tweeted has 'horrific barriers & tariffs on U.S. Products going in...This is odd on several levels,” continued Krugman noting that Disgustus routinely directs his ire based on “racial enmity”. “Why,” he asked, would tRUMP “rush into a spitting match with our allies that only serves the interests of enemies of freedom like Vladimir Putin? Oh wait.” 


Disgustus is, as usual, writes Krugman citing a 3 percent average tariff on U.S. Goods exported to Europe, wrong about facts.

Where is he getting this nonsense? Krugman suggests an adviser named Peter Navarro who came to the attention of Jared Kushner who was instructed to “find some research supporting his (tRUMP's) protectionist trade views”. Kushner then went to Amazon and finding a book authored by Navarro called “Death by China”, he cold-called one of the books authors, who became the campaigns first economic adviser”.

Krugman, a respected economist explained that Navarro, although holding Ph.D. nevertheless is (surprise!) out of the mainstream of accepted economic thought citing as an example Navarro's “complete misunderstanding of the trade effects of value added taxes (VATs), which the U.S. doesn't have but play a large role in most European countries' revenue”.

So how does someone who misunderstands such a basic, well-understood point about taxes and trade get to be a key economic adviser? As I said, it's because he tells the boss what he wants to hear. More than that, he's willing t abase himself in extraordinary ways.
Here's what he told Bloomberg recently: 'My function, really, as an economist is to try and provide the underlying analytics that confirm his intuition. And his intuition is always right in these matters.' Wow” Navarro, Krugman points out, is here declaring himself to be nothing but a propagandist, not only confirming the worst prejudice of Disgustus but kneeling to the lowest level of sycophancy, all but openly declaring our erstwhile Caesar infallible.

As Caesar Disgustus basks in the sycophantic glow produced by the house of mirrors that he is building about himself; as Caesar Disgustus prances about wearing his ignorance like a crown, came the news that he has accepted an invitation by North Korea to meet the Korean leader to negotiate some sort of settlement. The world trembles in the balance.

An Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”

Impeach and Imprison
______________________
  1. Krugman, Paul. “Springtime for Sycophants” The New York Times. Tuesday, March
    13, 2018. Page A24



No comments: