“In America the law is king. For as in absolute governments the King is law, so in free countries the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other”
----Thomas Paine “Common Sense”
“It is very possible that the president of the United States is a criminal”, writes Charles Blow in last Monday's New York Times,“And it is very possible that his criminality aided and abetted his assumption of the position. Let that sink in. It is a profound revelation.” (1)
Indeed it is.
But the essay lead off
with the charge that Disgustus paid off a porn star in order to keep
his affair secret; the secrecy necessary to promote his election.
Under the rules this qualifies as a campaign contribution, unreported
and in violation of federal campaign finance laws. Conspiring to
hide the contribution is a further violation. These are felonies,
but they carry no great punishments—normally a fine and a slap on
the wrist, perhaps in egregious circumstance a short stay in the
stir.
It is unfortunate that
right out of the box Blow would list this as the first sin among
sins. In doing so he reveals and further embeds our individual and
collective preoccupation with sex. We cannot afford to be
mesmerized by tits and ass, for the high crimes and misdemeanors that
are Donald J. Trump demand to be taken more seriously.
Blow quite rightly points
next to the much more serious matter of our Disgustus negotiating to
build a tRUMP tower in Moscow until election day, not mentioning,
incidentally, the more damning report that went beyond mere lies to
the American People, but involved offering Putin a free penthouse
apartment atop the structure should he approve the construction.
This charge, if true—and we can hardly doubt that it is—not only
involves bribery, and therefore a violation of racketeering laws, but
puts the entire relationship between Putin and Disgustus in an
entirely different lite.
Then there is the
obstruction of justice, his campaign ties with Russia—including
over three-score contacts between campaign operatives and Russian
principles and agents, and his public behaviors and lying about these
contacts all of which Blow duly notes.
As noted in a previous
post (2) the sins of Disgustus run deep. The New York Times
published an extensive expose detailing the crimes of the tRUMPs
revealing a multi-generational crime family. Tax evasion, bank
fraud, dealings with organized crime, violations of equal housing
provisions...
And this doesn't even
begin to plumb the depths of financial chicanery embodied in his
business dealings in central Asia (3), Panama and elsewhere.
All of these, pardon the
pun, trump the sleazy tabloid sex scandal that he tried to
desperately to conceal.
What emerges is a
kind-hell criminal who has hijacked the Republican Party and parlayed
the legitimacy it conferred upon him into the White House.
But, as Blow, quoting
Thomas Paine, rightly points out: “In America the law is king.
For as in absolute governments the king is law, so in free countries
the law ought to be king; and there ought to be no other”. (4)
Therein lies the
challenge. As the supporters of Disgustus hold that the president
cannot obstruct justice since he is the arbiter of justice, as they
hold that, therefore, he cannot be indicted or put on trial, much
less be impeached, the republic stands on the precipice looking into
the abyss. With justice itself become subjective rather than
objective the rule of law degenerates from statutory imperative to
the capricious and arbitrary whims of an increasingly deranged
madman.
“An Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh
Impeach and Imprison.
______________
- Blow, Charles M. “Surviving a Criminal Presidency” The New York Times. Monday, December 10, 2018. Page A27
- See. October 10, 2018: Fraud and Sham, Richly Documented Expose, Blood-sucking Vampires.
- See essay on tRUMP's efforts to build a tower in Baku: “August 10, 2017: Marooned in Baku,Giant Red Flag, Little Due Diligence” which deals with his corrupt contacts and practices.
- Op. Cit. Blow is here quoting Thomas Paine's “Common Sense”, a pamphlet that did much to justify the American Revolution.
No comments:
Post a Comment