Jan 25, 2020

January 25, 2019: Gog and Magog, The Rapture, Bat-Shit Crazy.



Many years ago the late Molly Ivins wrote about the links between George W. Bush and a certain fundamentalist sect in Southern Texas, about the 'end times' and the rise of the growing influence of the evangelicals in the conservative movement. Stephanie Mencimer has published an article in Mother Jones updating the movement and its adoption of Donald J. tRUMP as the instrument of the lord. It is frightening.

As a student in an evangelical Lutheran School, I sat and listened as my schoolmasters preached much of this nonsense. I didn't know it at the time, but what I was taught was merely the latest incarnation of long held beliefs that the end is nigh. The principles change names and faces, the Anti-Christ assumes various forms, according to the telling, from Caesar, to Hitler, to Stalin, to the Pope...Magog is located variously depending on the political winds, but the end is never in question. Here is the latest incarnation as it makes its way through the movement of the bowels. It is bat-shit crazy and, accordingly, I am submitting the article in its entirety:

The enemies of Israel have unleashed a massive air attack on the Promised Land. Hundreds of fighter jets streak across the sky. But before Israel can be destroyed, fire rains from the heavens and the enemy jets explode in mid-air with no explanation. Hailstones the size of golf balls follow the fire. The ground shakes. Birds pick clean the bodies of the fallen attackers. The enemy is vanquished without a single Israeli casualty, and the country is saved.

These are some of the opening scenes of the bestselling 1995 book Left Behind: A Novel of the Earth’s Last Days, by Jerry B. Jenkins and the late evangelical minister Tim LaHaye. But don’t mistake this scenario for a mere action sequence: It’s based on the war of Gog and Magog, a biblical conflict prophesied in the Book of Ezekiel. In the Bible, Gog is the leader of Magog, a “place in the far north” that many evangelicals believe is Russia. According to Ezekiel’s prophecy, Gog will join with Persia—now Iran—and other Arab nations to attack a peaceful Israel “like a cloud that covers the land.” LaHaye, like many evangelicals, believed this battle would bring on the Rapture, the End Times event when God spirits away the good Christians to heaven before unleashing plagues, sickness, and other horrors on the unbelievers remaining on Earth. Meanwhile, the Antichrist reigns supreme.

The story of Gog and Magog is central to the bloody eschatology long embraced by millions of American evangelicals. In recent years, End Times has gained special political currency as believers have seen any number of Middle East conflagrations as fulfilling Ezekiel’s prophecy, notably the US invasion of Iraq and the war in Syria. Gog and Magog took on fresh relevance earlier this month, when the Trump administration assassinated Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani, the commander of Iran’s elite Quds Force.

On many levels, President Donald Trump’s self-created crisis in Iran seems to have no relationship to any sort of coherent foreign policy or geopolitical plan for the future. The assassination has yielded few if any tangible rewards for the US. But there is an eager constituency for Trump’s improvised policy toward the Middle East and Iran in particular: the evangelical Christians who see it as a means of ushering in the return of Christ. Lured by the promise of conservative Supreme Court justices, anti-abortion measures, and a commitment to Christian supremacy under the guise of religious freedom, white evangelicals voted for Trump in higher numbers than any other group—more than 80 percent.

He desperately needs them if he’s going to be reelected. And while some have expressed concern about the administration’s inching toward war with Iran, many of those with what were once fringe beliefs have cheered the killing of Soleimani. “Iran has this big part to play in biblical history,” says religious historian Diana Butler Bass, who grew up in the evangelical church, attended an evangelical college and seminary, and wrote her Ph.D. thesis at Duke University on American fundamentalism. “There are these particular prophecies from Ezekiel, where there is talk of a war that will happen at a very important moment in Israel’s history. And that war is going to kick off the End Times. People in this prophetic community believe Iran is going to be one of these aggressors.” 


When Iran gets into the news, especially with anything to do with war, it’s sort of a prophetic dog whistle to evangelicals.”

Bass thinks this worldview may be central to understanding Trump’s foreign policy. “When Iran gets into the news, especially with anything to do with war, it’s sort of a prophetic dog whistle to evangelicals. They will support anything that seems to edge the world towards this conflagration,” she says. “They don’t necessarily want violence, but they’re eager for Christ to return and they think that this war with Iran and Israel has to happen for their larger hope to pass.”

Not all or even most evangelicals believe in the literal truth of these sorts of prophecies, though nearly 60 percent of white evangelicals, according to one 2010 poll, believe Jesus is definitely or probably going to return by the year 2050. But those who do subscribe to this apocalyptic world view seem to be overrepresented among Trump’s religious supporters and advisers. In October, a host of influential evangelical pastors came to the White House to pray with Trump to protect him from impeachment. Among those who laid hands on the president as he stood, head bowed, in the Oval Office, was repeat visitor Greg Laurie, pastor of a California megachurch. A few days after the killing of Soleimani, Laurie made a YouTube video with Don Stewart, author of 25 Signs We Are Near the End, to discuss Iran and the End Times. “The scenario that the Bible predicted, seemingly so impossible,” Stewart promised, “is now falling into place.”

From the outset, Trump has surrounded himself with people who hail from the fringes of the evangelical community that is steeped in the language of biblical prophecy, and his administration regularly reflects that language back to them in its messaging. In March 2017, for instance, Trump issued an official White House statement recognizing the Persian New Year in which he misattributed a quote to Cyrus the Great, the libertine pagan leader of the ancient Persian empire who was anointed by God to free Jews in Babylon. Ordinary Americans probably wouldn’t have even noticed the announcement, but evangelicals knew that Trump was speaking their language. Many of them believe Trump is like Cyrus, a flawed nonbeliever who nonetheless is chosen by God to work his miracles on Earth.

Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who was reportedly instrumental in pushing for the killing of Soleimani, is also a master of such messaging. In March, during an interview in Jerusalem with the Christian Broadcasting Network (founded by another apocalyptic preacher, Pat Robertson), Pompeo showed his familiarity with another Iran-centric Bible story popular with End Times evangelicals. In the story, a Persian king is urged to slaughter the Jews in his kingdom at the urging of the evil adviser Haman. But his Jewish Queen Esther convinces him not to and saves her people. Asked whether he thought Trump could be a modern-day Esther, saving the Jews from Iran, Pompeo replied, “As a Christian, I certainly believe that’s possible.” The secretary of state’s End Times beliefs made headlines again after the Soleimani killing, as meme-makers circulated a quote from a speech he made in a Kansas church in 2015. A few days after the Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage, Pompeo said: “We will continue to fight these battles. It is a never-ending struggle. … until the Rapture.”

The State Department did not respond to questions about how Pompeo’s religious views may affect his foreign policy decisions. But it’s not hard to see how apocalyptic evangelicalism might be influencing the Trump administration as it seeks to mobilize the millions of evangelicals reached by televangelists and megachurch pastors preaching the End Times. The most blatant appeal to this constituency came when Trump made the controversial decision to move the American embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, a long-desired goal of evangelicals who see it as fulfilling a biblical prophecy necessary in securing the Second Coming. What may be less obvious is how Trump’s disdain for international governing bodies like NATO also dovetails almost perfectly with End Times theology, whether he realizes it or not.

Matthew Avery Sutton, a Washington State University history professor and author of American Apocalypse: A History of Modern Evangelicalism, says evangelicals who believe the end is near have always been hostile to any sort of international organizations. That’s because they believe biblical prophecies that say that in the last days, a world leader who preaches peace will emerge and move toward a one-world government. In fact, the prophecy goes, that leader will be the Antichrist who will force the world to accept a false religion and persecute people who don’t accept him as a Messiah. (In Left Behind, the Antichrist is a Romanian UN secretary-general.) Evangelicals love Trump’s talk of pulling out of NATO, his attacks on the UN, and his trashing of the Paris climate change accord. “They hate the UN,” Sutton says. “Trump’s unilateralism is also music to their ears.”

Trump is not the first president to surround himself with evangelical Christians with an apocalyptic bent. Ronald Reagan was advised by Billy Graham and Jerry Falwell, and personally believed in the End Times and the coming apocalypse, writing about it in his journals. He appointed people like Interior Secretary James Watt, a Pentecostal fundamentalist whose disdain for environmental conservation seemed to be informed by his belief that the end of the world was nigh. In an appearance before Congress, he told stunned lawmakers, “I do not know how many future generations we can count on before the Lord returns.”

Apparently George W. Bush was also part of this apocalypse-now group. When Bush was trying to convince French president Jacques Chirac to support an invasion of Iran in 2003, he reportedly told Chirac: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East. Biblical prophecies are being fulfilled.” Chirac had no idea what Bush was talking about and had to consult a biblical scholar.

George W. Bush: “Gog and Magog are at work in the Middle East. Biblical prophecies are being fulfilled.” 

Trump, who seems unable to distinguish between the New and Old Testaments, doesn’t seem particularly fluent in the prophecies of Ezekiel. But he has brought into the White House a host of people who are. Quite a few also hail from what Bass delicately describes as the “not respectable charlatan wing” of evangelical Christianity. They’re the prosperity preachers and prophets of the sort depicted by Sinclair Lewis in Elmer Gantry. “I have no doubt at all that those people are sitting right next to [Trump], giving him these Bible verses, telling him about these prophecies,” Bass says, “which means that they are kind of egging him on, [telling him] that he’s part of God’s prophetic fulfillment for these last days.”

Many of those who have become White House regulars are associated with something known as the New Apostolic Reformation, what Christianity Today describes as “a loosely connected group of Pentecostals and Charismatics.” They’re the ones who speak in tongues, scour the news for clues to biblical prophecies, engage in faith healing, and preach prosperity gospel—the notion that faith in God (or, usually, the preacher) will make people wealthy (or at least enrich the preacher). These apostles tend to embrace “dominionist” theology that implores Christians to take over of all levels of government, media, and education as a way of preparing for the End Times and return of Christ. Influential politicians like former Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who has made several visits to the Trump White House, former vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, and former Trump Energy Secretary Rick Perry fall into this camp.

Peter Montgomery, a senior fellow at the liberal nonprofit People for the American Way who has tracked the religious right for many years, says that the network of preachers who come from NAR and Pentecostal media operations “are telling people over and over again that Trump was ‘chosen,’ that God intervened in the election. Some of them say very explicitly that Trump is playing a role in God’s End Time plans to bring about the return of Christ.”

One of the most prominent representatives of the Left Behind wing of the evangelical movement is San Antonio televangelist John Hagee, who has been calling for a war with Iran for more than a 15 years. In 2005, Hagee wrote a best-selling book, Jerusalem Countdown, that claimed the Bible predicted a war with Iran. (In 2011, it was turned into a movie of the same title, starring Bionic Man Lee Majors and Randy Travis.) Shortly after the book was published, Hagee created Christians United for Israel, a Christian Zionist organization that now claims to have 8 million members. It lobbies for support for Israeli settlements, military aid to Israel, and for the US to join with Israel to launch a preemptive strike on Iran.


He has said that gays caused Hurricane Katrina, referred to the Catholic Church as the “great whore,” called Hitler a “half-breed” Jew, and said that Hitler was part of God’s plan to get the Jews back to Israel.

Hagee, now 79, had once been popular with powerful Republicans during the George W. Bush administration, despite some of his more controversial statements. Among other things, he has said that gays caused Hurricane Katrina, referred to the Catholic Church as the “great whore,” called Hitler a “half-breed” Jew, and said that Hitler was part of God’s plan to get the Jews back to Israel. His star began to fall in 2008 after he endorsed Sen. John McCain for the GOP presidential nomination. McCain rejected his support, calling Hagee’s views “crazy and unacceptable.”

The election of Barack Obama consigned Hagee to his megachurch in San Antonio. But Trump has restored him to the corridors of power in Washington. Hagee endorsed Trump early in 2016. Once Trump was elected, Hagee met with the new president for two hours in 2017 to discuss moving the US embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. Foreign policy experts feared the embassy relocation would destabilize the region and hamper peace talks, but Trump moved it anyway in May 2018. Israeli troops killed more than 50 people in the protests that followed.

Hagee attended the opening ceremony alongside notables such as Ivanka Trump and husband Jared Kushner, and he gave the closing benediction. “Let every Islamic terrorist hear this message: Israel lives,” he announced. “Let it echo down the marble halls of the presidential palace in Iran: Israel lives.” He later told the Texas Observer that he was looking forward to Trump confronting Iran, explaining, “The sum of Iran’s evil is greater than the whole of its parts.”

When Christians United for Israel held its annual DC confab and lobbying day last summer, Trump sent no fewer than five top administration officials to address attendees, including Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence (both evangelicals themselves), then–national security adviser John Bolton, a special envoy to the Middle East, and the US Ambassador to Israel David Friedman. Pompeo opened the speech by telling the crowd of more than 5,000 people, “This is what it must have looked like to be part of the crowd for the fishes and the loaves. What a miracle that was.” Once more the story of Queen Esther came in handy, this time as Pompeo compared it to modern-day Iran.

Hagee is one of the most prominent of Trump’s evangelical supporters who see a war with Iran as a necessary step towards the End Times, but he’s far from the only one. The White House has hosted a steady stream of dominionists and NAR apostles since Trump took office, including Lance Wallnau, author of God’s Chaos President. An evangelical leader with a consulting business in Dallas, Wallnau has become famous as one of the few evangelicals who accurately prophesied Trump’s election after receiving divine inspiration to read chapter 45 of the Book of Isaiah. That’s the story of King Cyrus, whom Wallnau and many other evangelicals think Trump resembles. (For $45, Wallnau and ex-con televangelist Jim Bakker now sell a Trump/Cyrus coin that people can use to pray for Trump’s reelection.) Dr. Lance, as he’s known, has made several visits to the White House, including for a private briefing on Jared Kushner’s Middle East peace plan.

Facilitating many of these visits is Paula White-Cain, the controversial televangelist associated with the Trinity Broadcasting Network who became Trump’s spiritual adviser after he saw her preach on TV in the early aughts. White led a 20,000-strong megachurch in Tampa that was investigated by Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa) in 2007 for lavish spending on private jets and big houses and possible violations of its tax-exempt status. His report did not find any wrongdoing—church leaders refused to cooperate with the investigation—but in 2012, White’s church declared bankruptcy. She went on to lead a mostly African American church in Florida where she remained until last spring, when her son took over the ministry.

Now on her third marriage, White has long been at odds with more elite, mainstream evangelicals because of her particular self-help brand of prosperity gospel. Southern Baptist leader Russell Moore called White a “charlatan” and “heretic.” Nonetheless, in late October, Trump installed her in an official post at the White House office of public liaison to do outreach to evangelicals, formalizing access for some of the more extreme members of that group. She has referred to Trump as a modern-day Esther and called his enemies “demonic.”

 Bass says that evangelical elites of the sort who associated with President George W. Bush have long looked down their noses at populist preachers like White and her crowd, but Trump has elevated them to positions of power. It’s a win-win situation. The evangelicals are at last in the influential positions those who disparaged them once held. And Trump’s narcissism is receiving special nourishment by their insistence that he was chosen by God. “I think that Trump likes it when people think he’s close to God—he called himself the ‘chosen one’—and to think that all of this has some sort of divine backing,” Bass says. “I don’t think there’s ever been a president who was quite influenced by this stream of evangelicalism as Trump has been.”

Naturally, there are political benefits to all of this. The administration has struggled to provide evidence of any imminent threats from Soleimani, but the timing for the assassination was certainly fortuitous for someone looking to mobilize evangelicals. Not only was Trump embroiled in impeachment hearings, he was still chaffing from a recent editorial in the evangelical publication Christianity Today, founded by Billy Graham, calling for him to be removed from office on moral grounds. Trump announced the killing of Soleimani just hours before appearing at the launch of his campaign’s Evangelicals for Trump coalition in Miami.

That event took place at a Pentacostal Latino church headed by Guillermo Maldonado, who speaks in tongues and hosts a TV show called “The Supernatural Now.” He’s the founder of the King Jesus International Ministry, a Miami megachurch with upwards of 20,000 members and a large TV and radio presence. Maldonado is also another regular White House visitor who has preached that Trump has a role in God’s plans for the End Times. At the 2019 Global Prophetic Summit, he claimed that God told him, “America, I have prepared this time, I have raised somebody in office to open the doors for my gospels.”

André Gagné, a theology professor at Concordia University in Montreal, says the apocalyptic worldview is concerning at such high levels of power, because believers may be rather sanguine about the possibility that assassinating an Iranian general might spur an even bigger war or nuclear confrontation in the Middle East. “If it brings the end of the world, it brings the end of the world,” Gagné says. “They’re ready. They can’t wait for the Rapture to happen. For them it’s the ultimate reunion with God.” (1)


This is what happens when reason has deserted us,  we have suspended disbelief and learned to worship kings. 

An Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh
Convict and Imprison
    ________________










Jan 24, 2020

January 24, 2020: A Cautionary Tale, Modern Cleon, Brave Old World.


If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be the Mason and Dixon's, but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition, and ignorance on the other.” (1)
----Ulysses S. Grant

Grant wrote these words in the aftermath of the Civil War at a time when the forces of hatred and ignorance were organize themselves into the nascent Ku Klux Klan; forces that were soon to dominate the then Democratic Party and usher in Jim Crow.

Though the arc of history may lean, as Martin Luther King proclaimed, in direction of justice, the forces of civilization are, more often than we are willing to admit, besieged by ignorance, superstition and blind ambition. The barbarians are constantly beating at the gates.

In this context, Anonymous ominously gives us a civic lesson: the history of Ancient Greece, specifically Athens at a turning point. Keep in mind that the Parthenon, that great edifice of Democracy's glory was finished in 432 BCE. Here is what happened in the immediate aftermath. Athens marshaled its forces and, at the head of the Delian League (2) declared war on Sparta. Here is the story as told by Anonymous:

When constructing the American Republic, the history of Ancient Greece weighed heavily on the minds of the Founding Fathers and is relevant for understanding the implications of the Trump presidency. You see, Athens was a cautionary tale of how self-government could go wrong. It was an example of 'direct democracy,' a society where the majority ruled and where citizens participated personally in the assembly, voting on issues of the day by raising their hands. At first this was revolutionary, but in time, a herd-like mentality overcame the system. In the heat of the moment, the passions of the people could turn them into an angry mob, leading the majority into destructive decisions that proved their undoing.

The Greek experiment with democracy reached a memorable turning point in 427 BC. [Remember the Parthenon had just been completed 5 years earlier]. Athens was at war and tensions were high. The decisions the Athenian people faced were not mundane matters of bureaucracy, but life and death. Debates in the assembly were contentious, and powerful orators stirred up public anxiety. That year one of their long-standing allies—a city-state called Mytilene—defected and joined Athen's enemy Sparta. The Athenians squashed the revolt, but they feared that if they didn't punish th Mytilenians, other allies might abandon them, too. So the Athenian Assembly voted to kill all the city's men and enslave its women and children to prove a point. The next day, citizens got cold feet and called for another meeting to reconsider the hasty decision.

One of the most vocal speakers in the debate was Cleon. He will sound familiar to readers. A prominent Athenian, Cleon inherited money from his father and leveraged it to launch a career in politics. Historians have characterized him as a populist, on the the era's 'new politicians.' Cleon was a crass and blunt public speaker, an immoral man who frequently sued his opponents, an armchair critic of those in power, and an orator who preyed upon the emotions of the people to whip up public support for his opinions. Although some accounts characterize him as charming, his speaking style was said to be angry and repugnant. Aristotle later described Cleon as: '[T]he man, who, with his attacks, corrupted the Athenians more than anyone else. Although other speakers behaved decently, Cleon was the first to shout during a speech in the Assembly, [and] use abusive language while addressing the people.'

Cleon argued for slaughtering the Mytilenian rebels. He disparaged the 'foolish' public intellectuals opposed to the decision and urged Athenians to ignore them. The educated politicians couldn't be trusted; he suggested they might have been bribed to mislead the public. Government was best left to plain-speaking 'ordinary men,' like himself. Cleon argued that no one had ever hurt their empire as much as the Mytilenians, whose defection was an 'attempt to ruin us.' He warned that if they didn't make an example of the rebels, Athens would waste more money in more foreign wars, fighting people who defied them. Cleon closed by telling the assembly not to be 'traitors to yourselves,' to show no 'mercy' or 'pity,' to listen to their original gut instincts, and to 'punish them as they deserve.'

A man named Diodotus responded. He argued that ill-tempered decisions were reckless. Deliberation was necessary before taking action. Anyone who argued otherwise was either 'senseless' or was trying to scare the people with false statements, such as Cleon's insinuation that the other side in the debate had been bribed. 'The good citizen ought to triumph not by frightening his opponents but by beating them fairly in argument,' Diodotus shot back. He said mass slaughter would be contrary to Athen's long-term interests and that being lenient would allow Athens to win over many Mytilenians whom they still needed as supporters.

The assembly took it to a vote: kill and enslave the Mytilenians or show mercy by holding only the rebel leaders accountable? There was no consensus. With a show of hands, Athenians were almost evenly split. According to historical accounts, when the counting was completed, Diodotus secured just enough supporters to carry the day. With that, a horrific atrocity was prevented.

The story doesn't have a happy ending. The split vote demonstrated how pervasive Cleon's rhetoric had been, flashing the dark underbelly of majority rule. It was a preview of Athen's descent. Within a decade, Athenians faced a similar decision. This time, they chose to throw mercy to the wind and annihilated the island people of Melos. Within three decades, a mob assembly voted to put to death Socrates, the so-called 'wisest man' to have ever lived. The latter was the exclamation point on the death of Athenian democracy, which never recovered its former glory and eventually slipped into tyranny.” (3)

The Founding Fathers were serious students of History. They knew this stuff. Leaders of a revolution, they knew the passions of men. John Adams had famously defended British soldiers being tried for the Boston Massacre. They know division, they were well armed with the tenets of Christianity—particularly protestant christianity—that man is inherently evil. It was to control these impulses that institutions were created—in the form of organic law—the constitution—in order that the nation may “create a more perfect union”; and it is against these very institutions that our Caesar Disgustus wages constant war.

The Senate is now hearing the evidence and must now decide the fate of our modern Cleon. Will he stay or will he go? The republic hangs in the balance.

you make your choice at this time
the brave old world
or the slide
to the depths of decline”
----The Rolling Stones

An Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”

Convict and Imprison.

__________
  1. See: Anonymous A Warning. op.cit. Page 183. Once again I am indebted to Anonymous for a most prescient quotation.
  2. Op. Cit. Pages 184-186.

January 23, 2020: President* Bullwinkle, Mr. Know-It-All, Nature of Wisdom



A good moral character is the first essential in a man...It is therefore highly important that you should endeavor to not only be learned but virtuous”.
                -----George Washington

It should be obvious by now that our Caesar Disgustus is neither.

Learned? Please.

Let our self-obsessed “stable genius” describe himself:

On campaign finance: 'I think nobody knows more about campaign finance than I do, because I'm the biggest contributor.'

On the Courts: 'I know more about courts than any human being on Earth.'

On trade: 'Nobody knows more about trade than me.'

On taxes: 'Nobody knows more about taxes than I do.'
On ISIS: 'I know more about ISIS than the generals do.'

On the US government: 'Nobody knows the system better than I do.'

On technology: 'Technology—nobody knows more about technology than me.'

On drone technology, specifically: 'I know more about drones than anybody. I know about every form of safety that you can have.” (1)

Yes, Bullwinkle, everyone in the room knows you're a very stable genius; a “Mr. Know-It-All”

On the Contrary,” reports Anonymous, “I've seen the president fall flat on his face when trying to speak intelligently about most of these topics. You can see why behind closed doors his own top officials deride him as an 'idiot' and a 'moron' with the understanding of a 'fifth or sixth grader.' Folks have been forced to publicly deny those specific quotes, usually with non-denial denials. These are the tamest descriptions used internally to express exasperation with the commander in chief. People normally tack a string of expletives onto the front and back ends of their assessments.” (2)

One need look no further than the first of these boasts, and look upon his personal attorney rotting in prison for violating campaign finance law, a case in which Disgustus was cited as an unindicted co-conspirator. It was Rex Tillerson, former CEO of Exxon-Mobile and Secretary of State, who called Bullwinkle a 'fucking moron.'

Seeking to define leadership qualities, Anonymous turned to the ancient Roman luminary Cicero. Citing Cicero's “On Duties”, Anonymous categorized the qualities the founding fathers would prescribe for the nation: wisdom, a sense of justice, courage, temperance. In these he found the forever adolescent, our Peter Pan, wholly lacking. Wisdom cannot come from one so ill-informed. Wisdom cannot emerge for one with no sense of justice. Wisdom requires a courage that transcends the daily polls and the passions of the mob. Wisdom, foremost, requires temperance: the ability to delay immediate gratification—that is, the ability to take the long view.

What marks maturity from immaturity is the ability to see beyond oneself.  To see beyond oneself is to, more often than not, delay gratification. Throwing temper tantrums at the least questioning a proposed action, or an action taken, is the hallmark of the adolescent: the infantile.  There is a reason that Disgustus will wilt in the presence of an alpha male (Putin), or careen like a pinball when shouted down by Limbaugh or Fox and Fiends:  He hasn't grown up; forever the adolescent, his balls haven't dropped. 

It is the praying mantis and the child whose attention is diverted by immediate gratification and bright shiny objects. Leaders the world over know that you approach our would-be Caesar the way one would approach Ann Coulter or the female praying mantis: with bright worthless objects in order to distract his attention long enough to have your way with him. And so the constant bowing and scraping, the constant flattery, the constant feeding of a very fragile ego in order to get one goddamn point across, in order to take one miserable step in the right direction.

An Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”

Convict and Imprison.
________
  1. Anonymous. “A Warning” page 63. I owe a debt of gratitude to Anonymous for the words o           George Washington quoted here. 
  2. Ibid 63-64

January 22, 2020: A Warning, Pining For Nixon, America Alone


Nearly a year and a half ago, a bit over half way through the now three year long nightmare this nation has been forced to endure, The New York Times published a piece by a White House insider warning of the danger our Caesar Disgustus presents to the republic. Writing under the moniker Anonymous,(1) for obvious reasons, he or she assured us that there were adults in the room, that a cadre of albeit tRUMPists were on deck doing their level best to protect the nation and tRUMP from tRUMP. We can rest easy, we were assured, because there are adults in the room.

Anonymous has now published a book. A book entitled, alarmingly, “A Warning”.(2) In it life inside the people's house, the White House, is described accordingly:

The day to day management of the executive branch was falling apart before our eyes. Trump was all over the place. He was like a twelve year old in an air traffic control tower, pushing the buttons of government indiscriminately, indifferent to the planes skidding across the runway and the flights frantically diverting away from the airport.” (3)

'Among us friends, let's be honest,' a prominent presidential advisor once remarked, after the pro-chaos crowd left a White House meeting. The slimmed-down group was comprised of White House officials and cabinet secretaries. 'About a third of the things the president wants us to do are flat-out stupid. Another third would be impossible to implement and wouldn't even solve the problem. And a third of them would be flat-out illegal.' Heads nodded.” (4)

The presidential advisor Anonymous is citing could very well have been former Secretary of State Tillerson, who is has publicly said much the same thing. It could very well have been General Mattis. It could very well have been everyone in the room. Indeed, the process of briefing the president*(I) has become embarrassingly, and appropriately, juvenile, as befits the twelve-year-old in the control tower. Here's how Anonymous describes it:

Take, for instance, the process of briefing the president of the United States, which is an experience that no description can fully capture. In any administration, advisors would rightfully want to be prepared for such a moment. This is the most powerful person on earth we are talking about. But before a conversation with him, you want to make sure you've got your main points lined up and a crisp agenda ready to present. You are about to discuss weighty matters, sometimes life-and-death matters, with the leader of the free world. A moment of utmost sobriety and purpose. The process does not unfold that way in the Trump administration. Briefings with Donald Trump are of an entirely different nature. Early on, briefers were told not to send lengthy documents. Trump wouldn't read them. Nor should they bring summaries to the Oval Office. If they must bring paper, then PowerPoint was preferred because he is a visual learner. Okay, that's fine, many thought to themselves, leaders like to absorb information in different ways.

Then officials were told that PowerPoint decks needed to be slimmed down. The president couldn't digest too many slides. He needed more images to keep his interest—few words. Then they were told to cut back the overall message (on complicated issues such as military readiness or the federal budget) to just three points. Eh, that was still too much. Soon, West Wing aides were exchanging 'best practices' for success in the Oval Office. The most salient advice? Forget the three points. Come in with one main point and repeat it—over and over again, even if the president goes off on tangents—until he gets it. ONE point. Just that one point. Because you cannot focus the commander in chief's attention on more than one goddamned thing over the course of a meeting, okay?

.”I saw a number of appointees as they dismissed the advice of the wisened hands and went in to see President Trump, prepared for robust policy discussion on momentous national topics, and a peppery give-and take. They invariably paid the price.

'What the fuck is this?' the president would shout, looking at a document one of them had handed him. 'These are just words. A bunch of words. It doesn't mean anything.' Sometimes he would throw the papers back on the table. He definitely wouldn't read them.” (5)

At no time, Anonymous assures us, does terror strike greater fear than when a twit goes out or word comes down that “he's about to do something”. The bat-signal goes up, meetings are canceled, a pig's breakfast is made of schedules and the fire brigade descends upon the Oval Office in last-ditch efforts to save Disgustus from himself.

This is the Day-Care center, that former Senator Bob Corker spoke of in the early days of this maladministration. This is the White House described by other insiders as a Nursing Home where one reports to work every morning to find your dad running naked on the lawn and pursued by the attendants. Everyone who works with Disgustus finds him disgusting. Two things are certain, Disgustus—ever the adolescent-- is out of control and requires constant adult supervision.

A year and a half ago, Anonymous assured us that things were in hand. “It may be cold comfort in this chaotic era, but Americans should know that there are adults in the room. We fully recognize what is happening. And we're trying to do what's right even when Donald Trump won't.”

But he didn't and he won't. In any case, Anonymous has now issued his Warning that efforts to protect the republic have failed. The plan, loosely concocted by the “stable state”, to advance his policies when appropriate and oppose his capricious madness, have failed. Gone now are the Tillersons, the Maddis' the Kelly's. Gone too are Nikki Barber, Rick Perry, and others. Gone too is Jeff Sessions who now, in the rear-view mirror, looks like Judge Learned Hand by comparison. It's at moments like these that we find ourselves pining for Richard Shithouse Nixon.

Donald Trump is like a monster from the laboratory of a jackass mad scientist,” writes former Republican campaign consultant Rick Wilson, “built to represent the perfect antithesis of Washington's example. In almost every respect of his demeanor, speech, and affect, Trump is a clownish figure, a deserved magnet for mockery. From his absurd hair construct to his ludicrous ego to his pathetic, whiny need to have his alpha-male status affirmed at every moment, Trum is the least dignified president since William Howard Taft held a Jell-O-wrestling contest on the south lawn.
...”Why does dignity matter in the president? Because at some point in every administration, history comes knocking. Tragedy strikes. The nation looks to the man they elected to lead them and whispers 'Now what?' Large and small, natural disasters, terrorist attacks, crises require a president to be a moral leader, to guide, to heal, to comfort, to direct the painful energies of a hurt nation into positive direction. Trump can't stop looking in the mirror, a self-obsessed Narcissus in a fright wig”. (6)

If one doubts that assessment, look at his conduct in the wake of the shootings in Dayton and elsewhere. Descending on the scene, he speaks not of the pain and suffering, but of his crowd attendance. Imagine, if you will, an international crises. As Thomas Friedman has noted, when it comes Disgustus will find himself unable to marshal international support, unable to forge alliances. One's word matters. One's honor matters. Disgustus has gone back on our word, torn up our agreements and daily disgraces our honor. Credibility matters and when the time comes, Disgustus will be both unwilling and unable to respond. America First means America alone.

An' Br'er Putin, he jus laugh and laugh

Convict and Imprison.

_________________
  1. see: September 8, 2018: Our Scarlet Pimpernel, Off The Rails, Cold Cold Comfort
  2. Anonymous A Senior Trump Administration Official. “A Warning” Twelve Hachette
    Book Group. New York.
  3. Ibid. Page 34
  4. Ibid. Page 38
  5. Ibid. Pages 29-30
  6. Wilson, Rick. “Everything Trump Touches Dies”. 2018 Free Press. New York. Page 86



Jan 22, 2020

January 21, 2020: Tragedy Becomes Farce, “Boring Circus”, Vandalizing the Institutions


Don't you love farce?
My fault, I fear
I thought that you'd want what I want--
sorry my dear
but where are the clowns?
Quick, send in the clowns
Don't bother, they're here”.

         ----Stephen Soundheim, from the musical “A Little Night
                       Music" popularized by Judy Collins.

History repeats itself, Karl Marx once reminded us, first as tragedy, then as farce. Nixon gave us Greek Tragedy, our Caesar Disgustus, American farce.

The Impeachment Trial of Caesar Disgustus, Fox News warns its viewers, has become a 'boring circus,' a strategy that is nothing less than a transparent attempt to get their audience to turn its gaze from the turd stinking up their living rooms.

The standard now has become not right from wrong, not constitutional or unconstitutional, not moral or immoral but whether or not we are entertained. To that end, send in the clowns.

Moscow Mitch, true to the musical, has truncated the proceedings and rendered the conclusions of each days 'deliberations', such as they are, to occur in the dead of night. See no evil.

McConnell has further marshaled his forces to block any additional evidence or testimony, insuring that key witnesses like John Bolton, and Mick Mulvaney will not be heard. Hear no evil.

And, reportedly, if things get too hot, he has a 'break the glass' strategy wherein he will simply call for the Senate to dismiss the charges with a simple majority vote.

McConnell is, through farce, vandalizing the institutions of both the presidency and the congress, doing material damage to the constitutional principles of balance of power and congressional oversight. He doesn't care. He is only interested in reducing this proceeding to farce as a way of delegitimizing it in order to maintain power.

To that end, the sober presentations of Adam Schiff and the House Impeachment managers are rebutted by nothing but personal attacks and partisan vitriol. The nation be damned. The defense team arguing on behalf of Disgustus consists of, among others, Alan Dershowitz, another Yalie with a damaged understanding of constitutional law, and once defense counsel for one O.J. Simpson, and Ken Starr, he of Clinton impeachment fame. Both of these legal eagles are found presenting legal argument at polar opposite of their representations twenty years ago. Both conveying situational legal understanding as the nature of their case changes. Indeed the administration, with a straight face, makes the ludicrous argument that not only the president* cannot be indicted, but that he cannot even be investigated while in office. Propositions that would fail first year law students at Michael Cohen's Cooley Law School.

The legal defense of the golden swine is so transparently thin that one can read a Supreme Court decision through it. That is why Disgustus has stocked his legal team with television personalities, Clinton prosecution retreads, and political hangers-on. When there is no defense, pound the table and distract from the facts. When you get desperate enough you claim you're a victim of a partisan 'witch hunt' and scream what about the Bidens? On seven separate roll call votes, not a single Republican voted to call additional witnesses or subpoena additional records despite a long history of the Senate doing precisely that in previous impeachments. When they cannot win on the merits, McConnell and his Senate majority make a mockery of the proceeding by blocking testimony and fact.

Not a single witness has stepped forward to defend this president*. Not a single document has been presented in his defense. No testimony or documentary evidence has been offered to refute the charges, and McConnell and his caucus knows that if we probe further the evidence is even more damning. That's why they move heaven and earth, violate every precedent, every legal norm, every sense of decency in order to prevent justice from being served. Congressman Jerrod Nadler, chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary and one of the impeachment managers appointed by the House, looked the Republican senators in the eye and, citing their votes to prevent discovery, accused them of participating in the cover-up. McConnell and his majority are now material to obstruction of justice.

The strategy has been throughout. and continues to be. a simple one: if one cannot keep the political base from tuning in, then make it as unentertaining as possible, distract attention with shiny objects and false accusations, and render tragedy into farce.

Quick, send in the clowns
there have to be clowns
Don't bother, they're here”.

An' Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”

Convict and Imprison.



Jan 20, 2020

January 20, 2020: Herculean Task, Return to Normalcy?, Dubious Instruments



You say you'll change the constitution
well, you know
we all want to change your head
You tell me its the institution
well, you know
you better free your mind instead
But if you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
you ain't gonna make with anyone anyhow” 
                          ----John Lennon “Revolution”


With baited breath the nation awaits this date next year when, barring conviction by the Senate, one Donald J. tRUMP will attend the taking of the presidential oath by his successor and, immediately after the inaugural ceremony, handcuffed and frog marched to an awaiting paddy wagon. To the relief of the nation, and amid dancing in the streets, he will be taken down to the bailey, arraigned before a local magistrate on an array of high crimes against the people of the United States.

Meanwhile, as his successor addresses the nation and the world in what will certainly be an Herculean task to restore decency at home and honor abroad, the White House will be undergoing a fumigation as the nation struggles to regain its ethical compass and save its institutions.

That's the worst-case scenario, for it involves enduring this petulant mendacity yet another long year, as the corrosive effects of tRUMP and tRUMPism continue to course through the veins of our political body.

The best case scenario is that somehow enough Senate Republicans find or grow a spine and vote to convict our Caesar Disgustus. Absent that, it will be up to the voters to remove this cancer eating away at the institutions of this country.

On that score, two salient points emerge as we approach the Iowa Caucus and the beginning of the quadrennial election to determine who will be the next president of the United States. First we must ask ourselves if the country is now near completing the first quarter of this century or if it is 1920 all over again. Is this country yearning for a return to 'normalcy' and prepared to elect Joe Biden, our modern equivalent of Warren G. Harding, or is it prepared to meet the future with manly purpose head-on? I think not. As noted throughout these columns, the revolt on our hands is not a left/right ideological battle. It is not a battle against the institutions in this country. Our Caesar Disgustus grossly misreads this. It is a class conflict in which the middle class, writhing in pain and losing ground financially and politically, is revolting against the top ten percent, demanding a return of the republic. Status Quo Joe doesn't fit this bill. More of the same won't cut it. Nominating the latest incarnation of the Clinton's and their DLC clones will not motivate the electorate and will ensure that Disgustus is returned to power.

Secondly, there is no way absent inspired Democratic stupidity, that Disgustus can win this election through honest means. I say this because at no time has The Donald enjoyed popular support, either as a candidate or during his more than a thousand days stinking up the Oval Office. The electorate has taken to greeting the Republicans like a socially transmitted disease, a political form of gonorrhea or syphilis. Indeed, as it stands, over fifty percent of the country wants him convicted by the Senate and removed from office. His only avenues to victory now rest with the Democrats nominating some milquetoast candidate promising a return to the Status Quo Ante, or through the dubious instruments of voter suppression, foreign interference and outright fraud.

And as the republic hangs in the balance:

Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh

Convict and Imprison.

Jan 6, 2020

January 4, 2020: Hamilton on Impeachments, Federalist No. 65, No Illusions



The Federalist Papers are a collection of essays written by James Madison, John Jay and Alexander Hamilton. (1) They are a collection of works published in several newspapers advocating the ratification by the several states of the then newly created Constitution of the United States by the founding fathers at Philadelphia in the summer of 1787. Alexander Hamilton, writing under the pseudonym of Publius, wrote in Federalist No. 65, the following concerning impeachments:

A well-constituted court for the trial of impeachments is an object not more to be desired than difficult to be obtained in a government wholly elective. The subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men, or, in other words, from the abuse or violation of some public trust. The are of a nature which may with peculiar propriety be denominated POLITICAL, (2) as they relate chiefly to injuries done immediately to the society itself. The prosecution for them, for this reason, will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community, and to divide it into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused. In many cases it will connect itself with pre-existing factions, and will enlist all their animosities, partialities, influence and interest on one side or on the other; and in such cases there will always be the greatest danger that the decision will be regulated more by the comparative strength of the parties than by the real demonstrations of innocence or guilt.

The delicacy and magnitude of a trust which so deeply concerns the political reputation and existence of every man engaged in the administration of public affairs speak for themselves. The difficulty of placing it rightly in a government resting entirely on the basis of periodical elections will as readily be perceived, when it is considered that the most conspicuous characters in it will, from that circumstance, be too often the leaders or the tools of the most cunning or the most numerous faction, and on this account can hardly be expected to possess the requisite neutrality towards those whose conduct may be the subject of scrutiny.

The convention, it appears, thought the Senate the most fit depository of this important trust. Those who can best discern the intrinsic difficulty of the thing will be the least hasty in condemning that opinion, and will be most inclined to allow due weight to the arguments which may be supposed to have produced it.” (3)

There are several points to be noted here:

First, the founders were no idealists lost in innocence. They were well acquainted with the passions of men. They knew something of political faction, of the partisan. They were, after all, champions of revolution, emerging triumphant from the cauldron of partisan hostility, of the people against the state; of revolutionary opposing loyalist, of neighbor against neighbor. They had no illusions, as Hamilton here reveals, that the nation would soon enough be organized around faction; and that in this boiling stew of faction, these questions must be resolved. After all, impeachment would necessarily be produced by crisis. Indeed, innocence or guilt, most likely would, in the end, be determined not by the merits of the case but by the relative political strength and cunning of those involved.



Second, as has been pointed out several times in these columns, impeachments, as Hamilton asserts, proceed from the misconduct of public men; from the violation of some public trust. As noted in these columns, “High Crimes” do not refer to capital offense but to violations of public trust, of oaths of office, of abuses of power. These are, Hamilton assures us, POLITICAL offenses. Political offense demands not legal remedy but political remedy. They are therefore, by constitution and definition, not the province of the courts. Other remedy must be created. In order to do this the founders, as Hamilton points out later in his essay, turned to the British example of the House of Lords being the tribunal constituted to hear the arguments and resolve the issue. (4) We would follow the British example of having the people, acting through the lower house, investigate and bring charges and the upper house, representing the several states, serve as the court in which the matter will be decided.

Hamilton is here arguing that the Constitutional Convention hoped to create Institutions in order to dampen the passions of the partisan. For this purpose they had created the Senate, then to be elected not by popular vote but by the several state legislatures, accountable to the people once every six years, so as to grant a measure of stability. They knew something of unrest, having recently dealt with Shay's Rebellion as we have in our time with the Teabaggers.

Here Hamilton asserts that the Senate is best constituted to “discern the intrinsic difficulty...and will be most inclined to allow due weight to the arguments which may be supposed to have produced it.” Translated from the 18th century prose this means that Hamilton is here declaring that the Senate would become what it later claimed to be: The world's greatest deliberative body. Due weight to the arguments; the counterweight, it is hoped, to political strength and cunning. Deliberation.

This is the primary function of the Senate as charged by the Philadelphia Convention. Are you paying attention Leningrad Lindsay? Moscow Mitch?

An Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh

Convict and Imprison

__________

  1. Madison would later become President of the United States. John Jay would become the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. Hamilton the first Secretary of the Treasury whose career would later be cut short after being shot and killed in a famous duel with then Vice President Aaron Burr.
  2. Emphasis, in bold type, is Hamilton's.
  3. Hamilton, Alexander (Plubius) “Federalist No. 65” The Federalist Papers. Arlington House, New Rochelle, New York. No date. Pages 396-397
  4. Ibid. Page 397