“Not
only did I never work for Russia, I think it's a disgrace that you
even asked that question, because it's a whole big fat hoax.”
---America's Caesar Disgustus responding to
questions on the White House lawn
Alright let's translate. Whatever the pathological liar
in the White House says is untrue; truth is known to stand at polar
opposite of whatever comes from his mouth. Therefore to properly
interpret tRUMPspeak, what our faux Caesar really said is this: “Yes,
I'm a Russian agent, and it is very important that you ask that
question, because Putin has put a man who was once a useful idiot and
has now become a knowing and willing agent of the Russian Federation
in the White House. I am the big fat hoax.”
It is all about Russia.
Many, including MSNBC's Rachel Maddow have noted how he
tows the Russian line. From the Ukraine to Belarus to Montenegro to
Syria, to NATO, to the European Union, to Russian meddling in U.S.
and foreign elections, our Caesar Disgustus, when he is not carrying
the Russian's bags, is fawning all over him like some panting
teenage girl.Like that disgraceful exhibition in
Helsinki, the spectacle that is our would be Caesar is, in a word, disgusting.
This last week found him parroting the old KGB line
that the Russian invasion of Afghanistan was to root out terrorists.
No it wasn't. It was to prop up an unpopular communist regime. So
here we have the nominal president of the United States gratuitously
helping Putin scrub the historical record.
The editors of the The New York Times recently
noted that “Mr Trump's behavior simply since he's been in office
hasn't given any peace of mind even to those willing to give him the
benefit of the doubt—at least, those outside the Republican
leadership. In the past month, he announced that American troops
would pull out of the conflict in Syria, something that the Russians
have long called for. He subsequently said the Soviet Union was
right to invade Afghanistan in 1979, parroting Russian revisionist
history by claiming it was seeking to quell terrorism.
This month, it was revealed that federal prosecutors
had accused Mr. Trump's former campaign chief Paul Manafort of
sharing polling data in 2016 with an associate liked to Russian
intelligence, the most direct evidence to date that the campaign may
have tried to coordinate with Russia” (1)
May have? Of course The New York Times, America's
newspaper of record, always understates the situation. It has to. It cannot go too far out on the limb for fear of losing credibility.
The fact that the paper is raising the issue at all is terribly
significant.
Disgustus and his minions keep telling the nation that
no one has been tougher on Russia; but as we speak his Treasury
Secretary has lifted sanctions on Oleg Deripaska, with the blessing
of Mitch McConnell and his ReSCUMlickan enablers; sanctions that were put in place due to the meddling and the lifting of which will mean many millions of dollars to a man that Paul Manafort owes millions. Is this a way to please Putin and tamper with a possible witness in the bargain?
How serious is it? The Times reported earlier in
the month that the FBI had started a counterintelligence
investigation of tRUMP after he had fired Director Comey. Let that
settle in: a candidate for one of the two major parties in this
country is subject to a counterintelligence probe to determine if he
is an asset of a foreign nation—that subject now the sitting
'president' of the United States.
Now we discover that not only were there no high ranking
American officials in his two hour meeting with Putin in Germany but
that Disgustus took the notes of his translator and told him to keep
his mouth shut. In fact, we have discovered, military, diplomatic
and national security officials had to turn to the NSA and CIA
monitoring of Russian intelligence intercepts in order to get even a
rough outline of what may or may not have been discussed.
Why this secrecy? What is he hiding?
As the editors of the “Times” reminds us:
“'There's two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump,'
Kevin McCarthy, then House majority leader, told his fellow
Republicans at a closed door meeting, the Washington Post first
reported, shortly before Mr. Trump won his party's nomination for the
White House in 2016” (2). McCarthy was referring to now former
Congressman Dana Rohrabacher of California with whom his constituents
have had enough.
Disgustus imagines his countenance chiseled, perhaps
next to Teddy Roosevelt in the face of Mount Rushmore. Instead, he
will find himself next to Benedict Arnold as the newly minted face of
treason.
“An Bre'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”
Impeach and Imprison.
______________________
- Editorial. “Donald Trump: The Russia File” The New York Times. Tuesday, January 15, 2019. Page A22
No comments:
Post a Comment