"If the impeachment provision in the Constitution was not written for our Caesar Disgustus, then for whom?; and if the time to act is not now, then when?"
--from "The Quotations of Chairman Joe"
Tonight as we witness one of the astronomical anomalies,
a blood wolf moon, the nation suffers its second anniversary marking
the “Age of Disgustus”. As the “Blood Moon” passes
over a nation held hostage, it is long past time that the “Generation
of Swine” take stock of the damage done.
It has been a month now, with no end in sight. Good
governance, if not the national interest and common decency, require an urgent end
to this madness. But to do so will require that we dump tRUMP.
“There's
a strong case for waiting for the 2020 election”, (1) opined
Michael Tomasky in The New York Times, a
position echoed by former Democratic Congressman Barney Frank on the
season's premier of Bill Maher's show late last week. He wasn't
minimizing the principle, that the impeachment process was
written with Donald J. tRUMP entirely in mind. Tomasky was making the
case that his removal from office by the voters would be seen as more
'legitimate', and inflict heavy electoral damage upon the
Rescumlickan party in the bargain.
There
is a case to made for this, but it overlooks a couple of salient
points, the first of which is iterated by the quotation above from
the Chairman. The fact is that the 'boomers' had made a mockery of
impeachment in the 90's, not that our ancestors, in the Andrew
Johnson imbroglio, hadn't done likewise. Remember, it was our
fathers who moved to impeach Nixon, the electoral representation of
the Generation of Swine was
by then only half way toward full dominance. That is, the republic
had, by the early to mid-seventies, swallowed only about half the rat.
It was the nineties that gave us full-throated 'boomerism' when the
likes of Clinton and Gingrich rose to power. And, true to form, we
were 'entertained' with a political farce known as the “Clinton
Scandals”; a seemingly unending demonstration of moral turpitude and
lack of political as well as personal judgment; none of which rose to
the level of the occasion; but all of which stunk up the public
square—a stench that lingers to this day. Ergo: Benghazi and the
missing emails.
It
was the usual performance one has come to expect from the “Boomers”,
who consistently get their kickers in a knot over nothing but let
serious high crimes and misdemeanors go unpunished, if not unnoticed.
This,
of course leads us to our present conundrum. How do we dump tRUMP?
First,
it is important to understand that Disgustus will not go lightly into
that good cell. No, the king-hell boar will go kicking and
squealing, claiming that the office will have been stolen.
This response has been amply demonstrated. In 2016, following
suggestions by his Russian handlers, he laid down the gauntlet,
openly declaring that he would recognize the electoral returns only
if he won; that the election was being rigged; and that he would
challenge any result that did not give him his god-given office and
authority. This arrogance was further underscored in 2018 when the
Rescumlickans openly questioned election recounts in Georgia and
Florida as recounts were being done, even though their candidates
were then in the lead and the outcome looked entirely favorable. The
destruction of democratic norms demonstrate that there are no
Nixon's, not to mention Al Gore's, men who put the republic ahead of
party, present in the current cesspool that is the modern
ReSCUMlickan Party.
Disgustus will squeal no matter how the coup de grace is
administered.
To
venture down the road of impeachment promises, then, to restore the
legitimacy of this constitutional remedy and, incidentally, serve
as warning to any future chief executive. It represents a last
chance of the Generation of Swine to
achieve at least a measure of self-respect.
Yes,
I know, the chances of conviction in the Senate are slim, and the
failure to convict and remove would be seen as a cleansing agent, seemingly
removing the tar from our intrepid Br'er Fox. But this depends upon
how this is done.
I
am struck, at this point, by the fact that it has been a nearly a
month since the Democrats have taken control of the House
Intelligence and Judiciary Committees and there have been no hearings on what everyone knows has to receive a thorough
public airing. And the clock is ticking, for we do not want this to
drag into next year. A resolution on Disgustus must come, and it
must come quickly.
The dragnet must bring up this rogue's gallery of bottom feeders before the kleig lights
and grill them on the barbie. We must hold hearings and we must do
it soon.
Secondly,
each committee must forego the urge of members to engage in the
questioning, for this will lead to grandstanding. Instead, each
committee must leave questioning to appointed legal counsel where the
likes of Manafort, Cohen, Gates, et.al., would suffer the inquisition
by interrogators who, in a subdued monotone, would simply keep to
the script. “Just the facts, Ma'am”, as Jack Webb's Joe Friday
would say.
In
this way day by day, on national television, the nation will witness
just how corrupt is this administration. A thoroughgoing probe,
beginning with the Russian connections and then branching into
related subjects like Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross' connections and
corruptions, and then down through the cabinet and former cabinet
members. As the curtain is pulled back to reveal the cheap carnival
barker turned “Wizard of Oz”, the
fraud that is our Disgustus will become evident to all but the most
hopelessly deluded. His impeachment and conviction will
achieve the legitimacy it deserves and the luster of the
constitutional remedy will be restored.
And,
as the probes continue it is certain that Rescumlican senators up for
re-election will begin to feel the heat and join others in disowning
this national embarrassment.
It
is going to be dicey in any case, for Disgustus is no statesman. He
will not resign, except to save his fortune and keep himself and his
family from the penitentiary. We cannot allow this. It is time for
this nation to see the chief political scoundrel, as well as his
enablers, frog-marched from the corridors of power into long-awaiting
confinement. This will have a salutary effect upon the nation, for
it will restore confidence in the rule of law as justice is visited upon the heads of the mighty.
We
are not heading into a constitutional crisis. We have long been in
one, for this marks the second anniversary of the national nightmare
that is Donald J. tRUMP and all that he represents. If we fail to
impeach and convict then another precedent will have been set, one
that all of us are likely to rue. If Donald tRUMP cannot invoke the constitutional remedy then impeachment is no remedy at all.
As we move to openly investigate, Disgustus, ever more paranoid and unhinged, is likely to do anything. We, as a nation, can recoil at the prospect or we can see it as an opportunity to restore the institutional norms intended by our forebears; that is re-establish meaningful and effective checks between the branches of government. I suggest that once this crisis reaches critical mass that responsible heads move to impose serious restrictions on presidential authority.
As we move to openly investigate, Disgustus, ever more paranoid and unhinged, is likely to do anything. We, as a nation, can recoil at the prospect or we can see it as an opportunity to restore the institutional norms intended by our forebears; that is re-establish meaningful and effective checks between the branches of government. I suggest that once this crisis reaches critical mass that responsible heads move to impose serious restrictions on presidential authority.
First,
pertaining to the power the presidency has taken upon itself over
command of the armed forces. Yes, the president is
commander-in-chief, but this has been construed to mean that he can
launch, on his own authority, offensive actions anywhere in the world;
and, given the recent use of the armed forces during this fake crisis
on the border at our last election, this aggrandizement of authority
is being extended to the unchecked use of military force within the
country as well.
The
Congress needs to use this crisis to redefine this role by using the
war power provision of the Constitution to restore some balance.
Congress should act and declare that no use of the military will be
undertaken unless Congress makes an open declaration of war or
hostility. That is, the Congress should construe its sole authority
to declare war to include any hostile action, leaving the president
only the power to react to an overt attack upon the United States.
The Congress should also construe this power to include the use of
force against any domestic insurrection. In this day and age, the
Congress can be quickly gathered for such response, or the body could
be gathered electronically in order to provide authorization.
Secondly,
the Congress should, in a bipartisan declaration, serve notice to the
courts that if they overrule this legislation a judge or justice so
ruling would be immediately impeached.
Third,
the Legislative branch needs to gain more control of the Judiciary.
Judges, including Supreme Court justices, should be appointed for
fixed terms, say 6 years. Long enough to overlap presidential terms,
but often enough for the Congress to exercise effective 'judicial
review'. This would prevent the country from being saddled with the
likes of Clarence Thomas and Antony Scalia leaving justice waiting in
the wings until they mercifully pass on.
Fourth,
as a further restraint upon the executive, the Senate and the Senate
Judiciary Committee needs to establish the doctrine that the
Constitutional provision that the role of the Senate is one of
“advise and consent” when it comes to judicial nominees, is not
one of tacit consent. Instead the Senate should present the
executive with a list of nominees from which the president can
choose. This would fall under a useful and workable definition of
'advise'. Any other names sent up to the hill for consideration
would be dead on arrival.
It
seems to me that these measures would breathe new life into the
Constitution by reinvigorating the separation of powers by the
assertion of the Congress in the balance. This way the renegade
actions demonstrated in the ever-reemerging imperial presidency as
well as an overly activist Supreme Court, would be brought into check
and balance.
It
is unlikely that the Democrats, judging from the remarks of
Congressman Frank and others on the panel of Maher's show, will rise
to the occasion. It is even more unlikely that the Rescumlickan
Party, itself up to it's eyebrows in treachery and treason, will find
it's spine. Of course, the chances of that are less than that tomorrow will bring another blood wolf moon.
“An
Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh.”
Impeach and Imprison.
_____________________
- Tomasky, Michael. “What's the Best Way to Dump Trump?” The New York Times. Monday, January 14, 2018. Page A24
No comments:
Post a Comment