Showing posts with label Pepe Le Pew. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Pepe Le Pew. Show all posts

Feb 13, 2018

February 12, 2018: Maturity, Knowing 'The Other', L'Enfant Terrible.



“Maturity is being able to see through the eyes of another.”

                        ----from "The Quotations of Chairman Joe"

Maturity is being able to see through the eyes of another. This is its true definition. Being able to see through the eyes of another means that one must recognize 'the other'. One must be able to put oneself, intellectually and, at times, emotionally in the 'place' of 'the other'. In doing so one not only recognizes 'the other', but begins the process of legitimizing the presence of 'the other', perhaps in time getting to truly know 'the other'.

We define juvenile—meaning 'childlike-- behavior as a pronounced self-centeredness, often manifesting itself into an aggravating form of narcissism. Just as for the Greeks citizen was the opposite of idiot, maturity is the opposite of childlike. And what most marks the passage from childhood to adulthood? Being able to apprehend, understand, see through the eyes of and putting oneself in the place of the other. In a word: empathy.

To become mature one must have empathy. Those familiar with childhood development know that the process of recognizing, then knowing 'the other', takes some time. For some it is a normal process taking a few months or years; for some it is a long and tortuous process; for others it never happens. Normally the child begins to see beyond himself in childhood and the process of maturity becomes well advanced by early adolescence. In the case of our Caesar Disgustus, “The Donald” never took the first step toward maturity.

When columnist George F. Will wrote that tRUMP doesn't know what it is to know he was referring to objective knowledge. The problem runs much deeper than that. Caesar Disgustus' 'unknowing' extends far beyond textbook knowledge. Indeed it extends to the very heart of body and soul; for what makes Disgustus so disgusting is his inability to see beyond himself. He is an adult trapped in the mind of a three year old, held in the grips of a mental and emotional retardation that renders him unable to grasp the essence of anyone about him. People are simply objects to be used and discarded or, if he is offended, simply dismissed. Biographer David Cay Johnston relates how tRUMP reacted when members of the family sued because the heirs of his alcoholic brother Fred were not give their due. Disgustus cut off the medical insurance for his Great-Nephew who then died an early death. Explaining himself he simply told his biographer that “they had sued my dad”--that is his father's estate. This, in the eyes of Disgustus was an unforgivable act causing, in turn, an act of retribution regardless of the consequent pain and suffering. Disgustus could not relate to the pain he would cause for he cannot see through the eyes of another, he cannot see beyond himself.

This week we see him defending a White House aide who was forced from office by accusations of domestic violence, acts which prevented him from gaining the necessary security clearance for the job he held for over a year. Disgustus couldn't bring himself to see through the eyes of the victim, he could only chirp about what a sad day it was for the perpetrator, what a great job he had done while serving by his side (and, by extension, what a great choice Disgustus had made putting him there), and how unfair the whole process had been. Nothing about the pain and suffering of the victims, nothing about the inappropriateness and the mistakes made concerning the hiring of this man and keeping him in a position requiring security clearances that everyone knew were not to be forthcoming.

It is for these reasons that he fails so miserably at performing one of the most important tasks of the office—that of being consoler-in-chief. To console the nation one must have empathy and empathy, for this man-child, simply does not exist. It is for these reasons that he cannot bring himself to apologize no matter how egregiously offensive his actions. It is for these reasons that he takes no heed to the pain and suffering his policies inflict—on immigrants, the sick and elderly, on the poor, on minorities, on the very middle class upon whom a healthy republic depends. It is for these reasons that he always plays the victim, always throwing a temper tantrum, for he cannot possibly perceive his actions to be anything but honorable; any criticism as disingenuous and a betrayal. It is for this reason that Disgustus, like the cartoon character Pepe Le Pew, cannot understand why the country finds him so disgusting.

“The Donald”, as his second wife called him, simply never grew up; the child never became a man. And now the White House has become, in Senator Corker's telling phrase, “an adult day-care center”, where aides work tirelessly, if not entirely successfully, trying to control “L' Enfant Terrible”.

“An' Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”.

Impeach and Imprison
____________
Note: L'Enfant Terrible is a French expression meaning one whose startingly unconventional remarks or behavior cause deep embarrassment to those around him, as a child will often offend the adults in the room by inappropriate behaviors.



Feb 7, 2018

February 7, 2018: Polecat at a Barn Dance, Without Concern, Magnitude of Disgustingness



The tragedy that is our Caesar Disgustus is that he wanted to be president not to do something but to become somebody. He saw the elevation to the highest office in the land as the ultimate self-justification. He didn't become president to save the country but to save himself.

He thought that by reaching the greatest height he would achieve the acclaim and adoration historically reserved for the American Pantheon, perhaps, his likeness would be carved at Mt. Rushmore. He would become, as his chronicler Michael Wolff has suggested, the modern “Sun King”.

As his reaction yesterday to the less than enthusiastic response by his political opposition during his State of the Union Speech suggests, our Caesar simply doesn't understand why his in not loved by most of the country. Disgustus is indeed a cartoonish character, albeit an often frightening one. Into day's New York Times, Jennifer Finney Boyan wrote a piece that may at least partially explain the myopia that grips this man and this administration: that is, why he doesn't 'get it'.

“He grabs pussies, He kisses females without concern for revulsion and horror they feel for him. He grabs them in unexpected places. Does he ever experience rejection? He does not. 'Most men would get discouraged,' he says, referring to those he comes on to. 'Fortunately for her, I am not most men'.

He is Pepe Le Pew. Does he remind us of anyone else?” (1)

The essay, of course, is a delightful (if such unseemly stench can every be called delightful), and riotously humorous account of “what the president has in common with Looney Tunes' unseemly skunk.”

Each cartoon “ begins with a cat, usually but (interestingly) not always female, getting a stripe of white paint on its back usually (but not always) by accident. This makes our hero, Pepe, mistake the cat for one of his own kind—and his response to those of his own kind is always deep and passionate love”.

“He has a curious way of expressing it though. Even though he is French (which in the Looney Tunes world is shorthand for relentless amour), his terrible smell repulses the objects of his affection, who struggle valiantly to get away, sometimes successfully, sometimes not. 'Odor-able Kitty' ends with Pepe with a chain around his ankle. 'Now we are inseparable, are we not, darling'? he says. The shot follows the chain across the room to the cat, whose leg is also bound The last we see of the pussy, she is desperately hacking away at the chain, trying to get free.” (2)

Ms. Boylan did a masterful study of her subject. She learned that Pepe is not really French.

“In his very first appearance, Pepe's lovemaking is interrupted by his wife, who calls out is name. 'Henry!' Behind her are Pepe's two little children. He tries to explain himself, and as he does, he speaks in his real voice, which has an American accent...

Pepe's entire persona—the French accent, the image of a carefree bachelor, his very name—is a delusion. Just like Donald Trump and his failed university, and his failed steak company, and his failed casinos. Pepe Le Pew is fake meows.” (3)

“Virtually his whole oeuvre is a series of jokes about males who—no matter how clearly the point is made—cannot possibly comprehend the magnitude of their own disgustingness.” (4)

Finally, Ms. Boylan put it to the test asking her reader to join in a game which she called “Who Said It—Donald Trump or Pepe Le Pew?”

“You know, I'm automatically attracted to beautiful”.

“She thinks that by running away she can make herself more attractive tome. How right she is!”

“I just start kissing them. It's like a magnet”

“I am stupid, no?”

“I'm like, smart!” (5)


Boylan lists the answers to who said what at the end of the essay, but it hardly matters for the question is rhetorical. Both Disgustus and his cartoon inspiration are indeed indistinguishable and, like his protagonist, Caesar cannot comprehend the magnitude of his own disgustingness as everyone, including the First Lady, struggle to keep him at arms length.

Disgustus is, in her words, “Like Pepe Le Pew with neither French nor stench”. About the stench, she is wrong; for the foul odor now permeating 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue will take a fumigation and several decades to expunge.

He finds himself now ever alone, in bed with his cheeseburger, doing with it god knows what.

There were only 17 cartoons that Warner Brothers thought fit to cast Pepe in a starring role. His pungent career mercifully short-lived. Perhaps, that will be the final parallel between the pole cat and the pole cat at the barn dance. In the meantime, the country finding itself chained to a pole-cat feverishly gnaws at its hind leg, desperate to be free. 

"an' Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh".

Impeach and Imprison

______________
  1. Boylan, Jennifer Finney. “Pepe Le Pew vs. Donald Trump.” New York Times, February 7, 2018, pg A29
  2. Ibid
  3. Ibid
  4. Ibid
  5. Ibid