“Mother
nature is the last revolutionary, and mother nature is ruthless”.
---from “The Quotations of Chairman
Joe”
This week the editors of The New York Times wrote
an opinion (1) based upon a report by the United Nations
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The opinion is a siren
call to those in power to pay attention.
The panel “Says the world must utterly transform
its energy systems in the next decade or risk ecological and social
disaster,” concluded The Times, underscoring the gravity
of the report. (2)
Ninety one scientists from over 40 countries were
convened at the request of several island countries—all signatories
of the Paris Accords—who are rightly concerned about the
consequences of rising sea levels due to global warming.
“Fearing
that their countries might someday be lost to rising seas, they asked
the intergovernmental panel for further study of a lower threshold of
2.7 degrees Fahrenheit”, as
opposed to 3.6 degrees below preindustrial levels. “The
panel's report concluded that the stricter threshold should become
the new target. The alternative is catastrophe—mass die-offs of
coral reefs, widespread drought, famine and wildfires, and
potentially conflict over land, food and fresh water.” (3)
We've got, according to the best evidence, about a
decade to get our 'house' in order and, “there is no such thing
as a gentle glide path”. The world must go to public
transportation, fuel efficient cars and trucks, even diets must
change since cows with their constant flatulence contribute 14.5 per
cent of the greenhouse gasses in the form of methane. Renewable
energy must increase from around 20 per cent today to two-thirds of
the world's energy supply and the “use of coal would need to be
phased out, vanishing almost entirely by midcentury”(4)
“This
will take enormous public and private investment and technological
progress, even a breakthrough or two.” (5). In
short, it will require political will.
Therein lies the rub. Governments are, by their very
nature, reactive rather than pro-active, if not reactionary. It
stands to reason, for they have much invested in the status quo. But
the status quo, it is becoming increasingly obvious, will not hold;
for the status quo threatens to bring about the end of civilization
as we know it. If you think migration and war over oil is bad,
imagine war over food and water.
But
in the United States, long before the emergence of this buffoon we
have as Chief Magistrate, a movement has arisen that has made denial
it's political mantra.
Beginning with the idiot senator Inhofe of Oklahoma who first stood
on the Senate floor and denounced climate change as a 'hoax', more
and more the Rescumlickan Party has gravitated to the level of
environmental No-Nothingism. Deep from the bowels of the evangelical
madness that has always lurked just below the surface, a derangement
that welcomes—at some fundamental level—the end of the earth,
came the Teabaggers who have catapulted into congress men and women
with whom one cannot reason when it comes to climate change. But the
time Caesar Disgustus was imposed upon us there was already in place
an unholy combination of Koch-funded stink-tanks, a cabal of
willfully ignorant politicians calling itself the 'freedom caucus',
and a billionaire-funded 'astro-turf'(6). Movement posturing as
modern-day patriots. Before our Disgustus there were Sarah Palin and
Newt Gingrich; political arsonists with the social intelligence of
room temperature. Indeed, one can cite Ronald Reagan removing the
solar panels from the White House roof put there by his predecessor
Jimmy Carter. Rescumlickans don't know how to build, only how to
dismantle.
“Unfortunately,
no alarm seems loud enough to penetrate the walls of the White House
or the cranium of its principle occupant...(H)aving already announced
that he would withdraw the United States from the 2015 Paris
agreement on climate change, having also rolled back a suite of
Obama-era efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, Mr. Trump thus
reaffirmed his sorry role as an outlier in the global struggle
against climate change—a struggle very few believe can be won
without the enthusiastic participation of the United States”. (7)
And therein lies the rub. We have a major political
party in this country, ostensibly representing half the country,
lending political—if not intellectual—legitimacy to its policy
positions that has made ignorance and greed its mantra. It is
willful, belligerent ignorance, and unabashed, naked greed. This is
why Noam Chomsky has labeled the Republican Party the greatest threat
facing humanity.
“An
Br'er Putin, he jus' laugh and laugh”
Impeach and Imprison
__________________
- The Editors. “A Deafening, Piercing Smoke Alarm” The New York Times. Wednesday, October 10, 2018: Page A18
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
- Ibid.
- “Astro-Turf” means a false or plastic 'grass-roots' or 'bottom-up' movement. False because it is a billionaire organized and funded political movement designed to appear to be the spontaneous outrage of the 'people'. The first known appearance of such a strategy was the so-called Brooks Brothers Riots during the recount of the Florida election returns in 2000 when Rescumlickan congressional staffers came down from D.C. And, posing as Florida residents, packed the County Clerks offices and closed down the recount. The idea then took root a decade later on a national scale when the Billionaires funded buses and organized the 'Teabagger' revolt against Obama falsely claiming he had raised taxes only days after he was inaugurated.
- . Op. Cit.
No comments:
Post a Comment